When I started to
read Maus from Art Spielgelman which is a story based on the World War II –it's unnecessary explain you what happen in this horrible war, we already know that– it was very entertain for me that the characters on this story are not humans, there are animals which represent humans. Each country has a special animal that represents them, for instance, German people are cats while Jews are mice, the Americans are dogs and the French are frogs.
It’s quite obvious that
cats and mice don’t have a good relationship, because mice are at the end of
the food chain in this story and we all know that mice are eaten by cats. The same
thing happens with dogs and cats, we all know that dogs don’t like cats, and we
all know that USA was against Germany. Also, Poles are pigs which was actually the
term used by Nazis to refer to them –as an extra information, the bug spray “Zyklon-B” used by the mice couple when they are in the
Catskills is the name of the gas used in concentration camp prisoners, so Art
used many real references in the comic–.
Ok! It’s pretty evident
everything that I explained before. But Spiegelman play with this idea at the
point that mice are not an animal that all people like. He chose mice to
represents Jews because in that time, they actually were as that for Anti- Semite
people. They were less than human, they were seems as plague for the Nazi ideology,
a plague that had to disappear just as mice.
But also the thing
that makes connection with what has been explained and the reason why the
characters are animals is the epigraph: “The Jews are undoubtedly a race, but
they are not human”, which is a quote that was said for nothing more and nothing
less than Adolf Hitler, the man that lit the flame of this war, the person who
convince a whole country that this Semite group was bad at the point to kill them,
to commit genocide against them. When Art Spiegelman drew this comic, he wanted
to refute this quote with the story, he showed cats, dogs, frogs, pigs and mice,
all are animals as a contradiction to the quote in the sense that Jews are also
humans, they are humans as Germans, Americans, French, Poles and so on and so
forth. I don’t see any difference, not as Hitler saw it and the opposite idea
to this quote fix very well with the story.
Spiegelman wanted to
fight against anti- Semite idea with the story, showing animals as characters and
also with the tittle of the comic: Maus, which not only is how mouse is
pronounced. The word maus is the
first four letters of a German verb mauscheln which means “to talk like a Jew” or “to swindle like a Jew”, of course,
the word was used in a derogatory way in that time.
These three
aspects: animals, epigraph and tittle are ones of the many ways to show his discontent
with what happens in the Second World War.
As a personal
opinion, I had to say that the Second World War happened many years ago, but as
we are living an era in which the word “war” is seems so far away that we see
the history as a story, almost a fairy tale that makes us blind and makes us think
as it wasn’t happened, but it was real. The history is forgotten by many
people, so this stories as Maus, makes people don’t forget our past, as a
constant reminder that it cannot happen again.
I find accordance with yout thoughts Vale. I think that Art is great characterizing some "races" as animals. Even though, Art tries to be consequent with his view of the world. There are some cats (Germans) that are good people and some mice (Jews) are evil. Some mice wear pig (Poles) masks and humans wear animal masks. I found an interview to Art explaining his reason of using animals for his comic novel.
ResponderEliminar"After my self-excoriating doubts settled in, I realized that this cat-mouse metaphor of oppression could actually apply to my more immediate experience. This development took me by surprise—my own childhood was not a subject for me. But I did realize that if I shifted from Ku Klux Kats and anthropomorphized “darkies” to the terrain I was more viscerally affected by, the Nazis chasing Jews as they had in my childhood nightmares, I was on to something".
Art set agaist the racial stereotypes stating that not all kinds of animals are completely good or bad. I think we should take into account those ways of seeing reality to play off the differences between us.
I partially agree with you, Valentina. There is little doubt about the excellent comparison that Spiegelman did between animals and human beings taking into account the general thinking of that society (post-war society) and the author's background. However, I sincerely believe that the comic is contradictory since it uses the criticized concepts to criticize. What I want to say is that, Art Spiegelman tried to criticize that Jews were not treated as human beings in World War era, by treating anothers as animals too. It is widely known that what happened to Jews was an aberration but - as we talked in classes - when you complain about someone/something, you validate it, you make it present.
ResponderEliminar