One of the features that called my attention about
“things fall apart” was the arrival of the white man and its religion, and how
the Igbo people was invaded. Through the book, Mr. Achebe immerses us into
this unique ethnic group, through his costumes and believes and how it gets
contaminated by the white man intervention.
The white man has not “improved” other cultures,
it has only diminished the identity of rich tribes such as the Igbo.
Catholicism, Christianity, and basically any massive
religion believe that they have the truth and salvation for all of us. Faith
and religion have been used to take advantage of uncivilized people as if it
were a favor for them. Mr. Achebe makes us aware of how complex the Igbo
culture is and how rich it is. It is thought provoking how relevant was for the Igbo culture
the nature, the forest and their concept of “Chi”, which is a sort of personal
god or spirit or in different words, a guardian angel, which every person has.
So, why this culture should change? The Igbo’s lifestyle makes perfect senses which
their religion, because they are mainly agricultures, so it coincides with they
believe in divinities related to the nature and its elements.
Going back to previous units, religions
represent modernisms: they promote lack of individualism and they make you feel
as a gear. Why should everybody believe in the same god? In this group, their
god is called Chineke or Chukwu and there is no reason to contaminate this
belief.
Historically
speaking, several slaughters have been justified through religion, for example,
the crusades and several atrocities have been done with good intentions and
this is because sometimes different is considered bad.
At the
beginning of the book, Mr. Achebe uses an excerpt of the poem “the second
coming” by Mr. W.B. Yeats, which synthesizes accurately the arrival of the
white man and his culture as a widening gyre, which brings anarchy to the Igbo
culture.
To sum up, cultures
can be polar opposites, but that is what makes them unique and valuable. No
culture should be allowed to impose its beliefs or religion to another, because
that something is different does not mean that it is worse, it is called
identity.
I concur with your opinion. Not because a culture differs from the predominant one should we consider it as being worse or poor. I also want to point out that to use the terms "civilized" and "uncivilized" is a clear example of the influence the predominant culture or civilization has over the world as it sets the parameters that we use to determine whether different groups are civilized or not. As it is, if a culture does not follow the same tenants as the predominant culture and is not (economically) succesful then it is considered as uncivilized. And that is just balderdash.
ResponderEliminar